Introduction
The Chicago Bears vs Washington commanders match player stats from October 13, 2025, tell the story of one of the most exciting finishes of the NFL season. The Chicago Bears defeated the Washington Commanders 25–24 at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, after kicker Jake Moody scored a 38-yard field goal as time expired.
Both teams produced important offensive plays, but turnovers made the biggest difference. Bears quarterback Caleb Williams threw for 252 yards and added a rushing touchdown, while Commanders quarterback Jayden Daniels passed for 211 yards and three touchdowns. Running back D’Andre Swift also played a major role, combining strong rushing numbers with a long receiving touchdown.
This article covers the complete game overview, quarter-by-quarter scoring, passing, rushing and receiving statistics, defensive contributions, special teams, and the most important moments. It also explains why Chicago won despite Washington scoring three passing touchdowns and holding the ball longer during the game. Source: NFL game recap.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Overview
The Bears and Commanders met in Week 6 of the 2025 NFL regular season. Washington played at home and looked to use its offense to control the game, while Chicago aimed to build an early advantage and take advantage of scoring opportunities.
Chicago started strongly, building a 13–0 lead before Washington responded. The Commanders eventually moved ahead 24–16 in the fourth quarter, putting the Bears under pressure. Chicago answered with a 55-yard touchdown reception by Swift, then recovered a late fumble to create one final scoring opportunity.The Bears completed the comeback with Moody’s field goal on the final play. The result gave Chicago a narrow road victory and left Washington disappointed after a late turnover.
| Game detail | Information |
| Matchup | Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders |
| Date | October 13, 2025 |
| Venue | Northwest Stadium |
| Location | Landover, Maryland |
| Final score | Bears 25, Commanders 24 |
| Winning kicker | Jake Moody |
| Decisive play | 38-yard field goal as time expired |
The final score shows how close the contest was. However, the turnover difference was especially important: Chicago finished with no turnovers lost, while Washington lost possession three times. Source: Official Bears box score.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Score by Quarter
The scoring pattern changed throughout the game. Chicago controlled the opening period, Washington fought back in the middle quarters, and both teams exchanged touchdowns during a dramatic fourth quarter.
First Quarter Scoring Summary
Chicago scored two field goals in the opening quarter. Moody connected from 47 yards and later from 48 yards, giving the Bears a 6–0 lead. Washington failed to score during the period, and early mistakes made its task more difficult.
Second Quarter Scoring Summary
Caleb Williams extended Chicago’s lead with a one-yard rushing touchdown, making the score 13–0. Washington finally responded when Daniels threw a 22-yard touchdown pass to Chris Moore. The extra point brought the score to 13–7 at halftime.
Third Quarter Scoring Summary
Matt Gay made a 53-yard field goal to bring Washington closer. Chicago answered with a 41-yard Moody field goal, but Daniels then connected with Luke McCaffrey for a 33-yard touchdown. Washington finished the quarter ahead 17–16.
Fourth Quarter and Game-Winning Field Goal
Daniels threw a six-yard touchdown pass to Zach Ertz, increasing Washington’s lead to 24–16. Chicago responded quickly when Williams found Swift for a 55-yard touchdown. The two-point conversion failed, leaving the Bears two points behind.
Late in the game, Washington fumbled during a handoff involving Daniels and running back Jeremy McNichols. Chicago recovered, drove into field-goal range, and Moody made a 38-yard kick as time expired to secure the 25–24 victory. Official scoring summary.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Full Box Score
The player statistics show different strengths for both teams. Chicago received a strong all-around contribution from Williams and Swift, while Washington relied heavily on Daniels’ passing performance.
Quarterback Statistics
| Statistic | Caleb Williams | Jayden Daniels |
| Completions/Attempts | 17/29 | 19/26 |
| Passing yards | 252 | 211 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks taken | 3 | 3 |
| Passer rating | 98.6 | 119.2 |
Leading Rushing and Receiving Statistics
| Player | Team | Key statistics |
| D’Andre Swift | Bears | 108 rushing yards; 67 receiving yards |
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | Commanders | 61 rushing yards |
| Jayden Daniels | Commanders | 52 rushing yards |
| Luther Burden III | Bears | 51 receiving yards |
| Zach Ertz | Commanders | 43 receiving yards; 1 touchdown |
| Chris Moore | Commanders | 46 receiving yards; 1 touchdown |
| Luke McCaffrey | Commanders | 33 receiving yards; 1 touchdown |
These figures highlight the major contributors, but they do not represent every player’s complete box score. For a full breakdown, including individual defensive statistics and additional players, consult the official NFL game box score.
Quarterback Stats: Caleb Williams vs Jayden Daniels
Caleb Williams Passing and Rushing Performance
Caleb Williams completed 17 of 29 passes for 252 yards, one passing touchdown, and no interceptions. His performance helped Chicago maintain scoring opportunities even when Washington moved ahead late in the game.
Williams also scored a one-yard rushing touchdown in the second quarter. That play was important because it extended Chicago’s lead to 13 points and gave the offense an early advantage. His passing connection with Swift later produced a 55-yard touchdown that brought the Bears within reach of the lead.
Williams was sacked three times, so the performance was not without pressure. However, he protected the ball from interceptions and helped guide the final drive after Chicago recovered Washington’s late fumble.
Jayden Daniels Passing and Rushing Performance
Daniels completed 19 of 26 passes for 211 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception. His passer rating of 119.2 was higher than Williams’ 98.6, showing that he made efficient use of his passing opportunities.His touchdown passes went to Chris Moore, Luke McCaffrey, and Zach Ertz. Daniels also rushed for 52 yards, giving Washington another way to move the ball.
Despite those positive numbers, Daniels threw an interception to safety Jaquan Brisker and was involved in the late fumble that gave Chicago another possession. His statistics demonstrate why passing efficiency alone cannot explain the final result: turnovers at crucial moments can outweigh strong individual numbers.
Chicago Bears Rushing Stats and Top Performers
D’Andre Swift’s Rushing Performance
Swift was Chicago’s leading rusher, finishing with 108 yards on 14 carries. That works out to approximately 7.7 yards per carry, a strong average that helped the Bears create explosive plays.
His contribution was not limited to running the ball. Swift caught two passes for 67 yards, including the 55-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter. This combination made him one of the most influential offensive players in the matchup.
Caleb Williams’ Rushing Touchdown
Williams added a rushing touchdown from one yard out in the second quarter. Quarterback runs near the goal line can be valuable because they force the defense to account for the possibility of the quarterback keeping the ball rather than handing it to a running back.
Chicago’s Other Running Backs
Kyle Monangai recorded five carries for 19 yards. Although his individual total was smaller than Swift’s, additional rushing options helped Chicago balance its offense.Chicago’s running game also supported the final drive. After the late fumble recovery, Swift carried the ball repeatedly and gained important yards to help move the Bears into field-goal range. This was a practical example of how rushing production can matter most during a short, high-pressure possession.
Washington Commanders Rushing Stats and Top Performers
Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s Rushing Numbers
Jacory Croskey-Merritt carried the ball 17 times for 61 yards. His workload made him an important part of Washington’s rushing attack, although his average of roughly 3.6 yards per carry was below Swift’s average.Croskey-Merritt’s involvement also became part of the decisive final sequence. Washington was attempting to maintain possession late in the fourth quarter when the exchange between Daniels and Jeremy McNichols went wrong. McNichols, rather than Croskey-Merritt, was involved in that late handoff and fumble.
Jayden Daniels’ Ground Production
Daniels added 52 rushing yards on 10 carries. His mobility helped Washington extend plays and gave Chicago’s defense another responsibility beyond covering receivers.
Washington’s Team Rushing Performance
Washington’s rushing game helped the offense control possession, but the Commanders could not protect the ball consistently. Their 31:34 time of possession was longer than Chicago’s 28:26, yet they still lost.
The key lesson is that rushing totals and possession time must be considered alongside turnovers and scoring efficiency. Moving the ball is useful, but teams must finish drives and avoid giving opponents extra opportunities. Source: Pro-Football-Reference.
Receiving Stats: Bears vs Commanders
Chicago Bears’ Leading Receivers
Swift was Chicago’s biggest receiving threat in terms of yards among the leading performers listed here. His two catches produced 67 yards, including the long touchdown that kept the Bears in the contest.Luther Burden III also contributed four receptions for 51 yards. Chicago’s passing game did not depend on a single receiver for every important play, and Swift’s ability to catch the ball out of the backfield created a difficult matchup for Washington’s defense.
Washington Commanders’ Leading Receivers
Zach Ertz caught six passes for 43 yards and a touchdown. Chris Moore gained 46 yards on three catches and scored on a 22-yard pass from Daniels. Luke McCaffrey added 33 yards on a single reception, which became a 33-yard touchdown.
Longest Receptions and Receiving Touchdowns
Swift’s 55-yard touchdown was Chicago’s most important receiving play. For Washington, McCaffrey’s 33-yard scoring catch provided a major momentum shift in the third quarter.Receiving numbers should be judged by more than total yards. Touchdowns, timing, and the ability to convert a play into points all matter. Washington produced three passing touchdowns, but Chicago’s late receiving score helped set up the comeback.
Defensive Player Stats, Interceptions, and Turnovers
Chicago’s Defensive Takeaways
Chicago’s defense created important opportunities by forcing Washington to give up possession. Jaquan Brisker intercepted Daniels in the first quarter, ending a Commanders drive and preventing an early scoring opportunity.Montez Sweat also helped force a fumble by rookie running back Croskey-Merritt during Washington’s next possession. These early turnovers contributed to Chicago’s 13–0 lead.
Washington’s Defensive Pressure and Key Stops
Washington had some important defensive moments, including a blocked field-goal attempt by Daron Payne. That play prevented Chicago from adding points and showed that the Commanders could still make game-changing plays on defense.
Fumbles, Lost Possessions, and Game-Changing Plays
Washington committed three turnovers, while Chicago did not lose a turnover. The most costly came late in the fourth quarter, when Nahshon Wright recovered the fumble involving Daniels and McNichols.The recovery gave Chicago the ball at Washington’s 44-yard line. Instead of allowing the Commanders to run down the clock, Chicago gained another chance to score. The defense therefore played a direct role in the result, even though the winning points came from a field goal rather than a defensive touchdown. Source: The Washington Post game report.
Special Teams Stats and Kicking Performance
Jake Moody’s Field Goals and Extra Points
Moody made four of five field-goal attempts in his Bears debut, including kicks from 47, 48, and 41 yards before the winning 38-yard attempt. He also converted the extra point following Williams’ rushing touchdown.His missed field-goal attempt was blocked by Washington, but he recovered from that setback and delivered the decisive kick at the end of the game.
Matt Gay’s Kicking Performance
Gay made Washington’s 53-yard field goal and converted the extra points after Daniels’ three touchdown passes. His contributions kept Washington on course to win, but the late fumble meant his team needed one more defensive stop.
Punt and Kickoff Returns
Return statistics can help explain field position, but they were not the main reason for this result. The clearest special-teams difference was Chicago’s successful final kick. Moody’s field goal turned the late turnover into the winning points and completed the comeback.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Team Stats Comparison
The team totals show that the game was competitive in several areas. Washington recorded more first downs and held the ball longer, while Chicago gained more total yards and avoided turnovers.
| Team statistic | Bears | Commanders |
| Total net yards | 386 | 329 |
| Net passing yards | 236 | 205 |
| Rushing yards | 145 | 124 |
| First downs | 19 | 22 |
| Third-down conversions | 3/10 | 3/8 |
| Penalties | 9 | 5 |
| Penalty yards | 84 | 40 |
| Time of possession | 28:26 | 31:34 |
| Turnovers lost | 0 | 3 |
Washington’s 22 first downs and longer possession time show that the offense could sustain drives. However, the Commanders gave the ball away three times, creating extra opportunities for Chicago.
The Bears also gained more total net yards and committed fewer costly mistakes. Chicago’s nine penalties for 84 yards were a clear weakness, but the team still found a way to win. The comparison demonstrates that no single statistic tells the entire story. Turnovers, field position, and execution in the final minutes often have a greater effect on the scoreboard than possession time alone.
Key Moments That Decided the Game
The first major turning point came when Chicago built a 13–0 lead. Washington then had to chase the game, and its offense responded with three touchdown passes from Daniels.
The second major moment was McCaffrey’s 33-yard touchdown, which gave Washington a 17–16 lead in the third quarter. Ertz’s fourth-quarter touchdown then increased the Commanders’ advantage to 24–16.Chicago answered when Williams connected with Swift for a 55-yard touchdown. The failed two-point conversion meant Washington remained ahead, but the Bears were close enough to take advantage of another opportunity.
That opportunity came when Wright recovered the late fumble. Chicago’s offense then moved the ball 36 yards over nine plays, with Swift contributing key runs. Moody’s 38-yard field goal as time expired completed the comeback.The sequence shows how a game can turn quickly. Washington had the lead, but one lost possession changed the result.
What the Match Player Stats Reveal?
The numbers reveal three main lessons. First, Chicago’s offense benefited from Swift’s ability to contribute as both a runner and receiver. His 108 rushing yards and 67 receiving yards created multiple ways for the Bears to attack.Second, Daniels was an effective passer, throwing three touchdown passes and earning a higher passer rating than Williams. Yet his interception and involvement in the late fumble were costly. Strong passing numbers cannot always compensate for mistakes that give the opponent extra scoring chances.
Third, Chicago made better use of its opportunities. The Bears scored early, kept their own turnover total at zero, and took advantage of Washington’s mistakes. The final field goal was only possible because the defense recovered the ball and the offense moved into range.These points explain why the final result was not simply a contest between two quarterbacks. Offensive production, defensive takeaways, discipline, and special teams all influenced the outcome.
Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Head to Head History
The Bears and Commanders have met across several NFL eras, and their meetings provide context for this result. However, historical records should not be mixed with statistics from the October 13, 2025 game.
The 2025 matchup was especially memorable because Chicago won by one point on the final play. The teams had contrasting experiences during the game: Chicago started quickly, while Washington rallied and took the lead before the late turnover changed everything.
For a head-to-head section, use a reliable historical database to verify previous scores and dates before listing them. This avoids confusing regular-season games with playoff meetings or including statistics from different seasons in the current box score. The Pro-Football-Reference game page is a useful starting point for the featured matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Bears vs Commanders game?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Washington Commanders 25–24 on October 13, 2025, at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland.
2. How many passing yards did Caleb Williams record?
Williams completed 17 of 29 passes for 252 yards, one passing touchdown, and no interceptions.
3. How many touchdowns did Jayden Daniels throw?
Daniels threw three touchdown passes, connecting with Chris Moore, Luke McCaffrey, and Zach Ertz.
4. Who led the Bears in rushing?
D’Andre Swift led Chicago with 108 rushing yards on 14 carries. He also gained 67 receiving yards and scored a receiving touchdown.
5. Which player made the game-winning field goal?
Jake Moody made a 38-yard field goal as time expired to give Chicago the 25–24 victory.
Conclusion
The Chicago Bears vs Washington commanders match player stats show how turnovers and late-game execution shaped Chicago’s 25–24 victory. Caleb Williams passed for 252 yards and scored a rushing touchdown, while D’Andre Swift delivered 108 rushing yards and a key 55-yard receiving touchdown. Jayden Daniels threw three touchdown passes, but Washington’s three turnovers proved costly.The decisive moment came when Nahshon Wright recovered a late fumble, giving Chicago the chance to move into field-goal range. Jake Moody then made the winning 38-yard kick as time expired. The game is a strong example of why teams must protect the ball and execute under pressure. Although Washington produced several impressive offensive statistics, Chicago made better use of its final opportunity and left Landover with a memorable road win.
